Arabella’s reading of Romances has
given her a sense of power. She believes she can control situations just by
commanding. When Arabella hears of Mr. Hervey being sick in bed, she insists
that her letter to him will help him recover. She says, “he will recover, if I
command him to do so” (16). Arabella really believes she has the power to stop
death if she only commands. She derives this power from reading romances. For
example, she gives an account of Mazares and Mandana, and Oroondates and
Statira, where the heroines command their lovers to live (47, 48). Arabella tells
Lucy that in Romances, the heroine’s lover does not die if she insists he lives
(16).
In another encounter, Arabella
tells Mr. Hervey “you are now wholly in my Power” and “I’ll give you Freedom”
only if he obeys her commands. Because of her romantic notions, Arabella
assumes authority over situations, believing it is her right to do so. She also
has power over people. She even convinced the servants to hold Mr. Hervey back
even though he offered no sign of threat and no pistol was in sight.
Arabella also controls Lucy. As
ridiculous as Arabella sounds, Lucy is easily convinced by her and does as
Arabella commands. Lucy does not simply obey Arabella because of her rank, but admits
to even agreeing with her. Early on in the novel, Arabella convinces Lucy that
the gardener is a man of higher degree in disguise to pursue Arabella. Lucy
says she thought him to be a simple gardener but instantly changes her mind
when Arabella asks her a series of questions. Lucy then says to her, “now you
open my Eyes” (24). Lucy is continually fooled by Arabella’s ridiculousness and
believes in her imaginations (for example, Arabella fools Lucy into thinking a
man is there to steal her away, 93).
Throughout the novel, Arabella
asserts herself one way or another, and even makes commands. She speaks freely
to the men she encounters (which are of course based off of her reading of
romances), and even to her own father. She openly confronts Sir Charles about
his intentions towards her! Arabella, using her knowledge from reading
romances, even corrects and embarrasses Mr. Selvin during his discussion of
ancient history (265). She is verbally expressive. It is also a sort of
empowerment for a woman to correct a man’s knowledge when it is generally
believed that men are the more knowledgeable sex.
In another earlier occasion,
Arabella tells Mr. Glanville “I am rather to accuse the Slowness of your
Understanding, for your persisting in treating me thus freely” (36). As
ridiculous as her notions are, she nonetheless voices her opinions and thoughts
freely. The narrator states, “strange as her Notions of life appeared, yet they
were supported with so much Wit and Delicacy” (45). The narrator notes on
several occasions how Mr. Glanville finds Arabella’s behavior strange and yet
“smiles” at her. Arabella asserts a strange power over those around her and Mr.
Glanville is “in the Possession of a Woman” (118).
A scene that I found to be very
strange was in the conversation between Arabella and her father. It is common
for heroines in distress to take their own life in 18th century
literature. Arabella is aware of this and desires to “imitate” these women of
“Courage” to avoid marrying Mr. Glanville. Arabella finds power in taking her
own life, claiming that she is just as “capable” in doing so as the romantic
heroines she reads (54). When her father threatens to burn her books, Arabella
laments the fate of the heroines who “were going to be cast into the merciless
Flames” (55). Arabella’s imagination is so strong that she believes the
characters in her books to be real and suffer a true fate caused by events
outside the books themselves. The fact that Arabella sees power in deciding to
take her own life away, and laments the powerlessness of her heroines (or
“innocent Victims” 57) who will suffer at the hands of someone else, is a
fascinating and strange part of the novel.
An interesting addition to this is
Arabella’s imaginative thought that the men who cross her path will commit suicide
upon her rejecting them. She makes sure to tell her father if Mr. Glanville has
taken his life, she did not “desire” for him to do so (38, 39). She actually
believes she has the power to push men into suicide over their supposed grief, just
as I observed earlier that she believes in her power to command men to live (for
example, she commands Sir George, who plays along with Arabella’s fancy, to
live too).
In the end, Arabella is reformed and is no longer disillusioned. Thus, she has lost her power. Is
Lennox indicating that female power is unrealistic? Is female power
unacceptable and made ridiculous by society? Though her heroine loses power,
has Lennox gained her own sense of power by writing in a male-dominated form to
explore a female realm?
I have been interested in RED every since Professor Maruca introduced us to it. I decided to search "The Female Quixote" in the UK RED and came across Jane Austen's reading experience and how it helped shape her Northanger Abbey. I always read Northanger Abbey in response to Ann Radcliffe's Romance of the Forest, so I am definitely looking forward to keeping Lennox and the issue of education in mind as we end the semester with Austen.
Here's a link to Austen's reading experience: http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/reading/UK/record_details.php?id=132
I did some thinking about the idea of Arabella's "submission" at the end of the novel, and I am still confused. It would be easy enough for Lennox to end the book just like that, in order to appease common social values and make some money. At the same time, Arabella, though "losing power," is gaining the literacy required to negotiate a world she previously did not fit into. Since Arabella's story is abruptly cut off, we cannot know whether this newfound fluency in normal, real-life society ended up benefitting Arabella, but this might be one way of putting a better construction on the ending.
ReplyDeleteI believe it is in the introduction to Love in Excess that the editor points out that, in the eighteenth-century, women were viewed always as "relational beings": daughters, sisters, wives, and mothers. What I found so remarkable about Arabella, then, was that, by figuring herself as the lead character in her own story, others existed only in relationship to her. Thus, she ws able to act, asserting herself and making commands,as you mention, rather than simply react, to which most women would have been limited by contemporary society. One powerful and provocative statement I think Lennox makes here, then, intentionally or otherwise, is to suggest that, because Arabella is able to exercise power over others simply by believing herself empowered, the lack of agency that most women of her day experienced was purely a result of social mores, rather than any inherent aspect of her sex.
ReplyDelete